Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SAMA ASSAVAAKUL – Appellant
Versus
CHOO KAH HOE & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the plaintiff's claims and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. details of the plaintiff's first suit and its implications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23) |
| 3. court's analysis of the abuse of process. (Para 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. legal precedents on abuse of process and compliance. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 5. consequences of non-compliance with court orders. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 43 , 57) |
Introduction
[1] The Defendants filed an application vide encl 12 seeking to strike out the Plaintiff's claim against the Defendants pursuant to O 18 r 19 (a) and/or (b) and/or (c) and/or (d) and/or O 92 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 ( ROC 2012) . The Defendants' claimed that the Plaintiff failed to demonstrate the reasonable cause of action against the Defendants and are also scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of the Court's process.
Brief Facts
[2] The Plaintiff's claim against the Defendants, in summary, is as stated below.
[3] The Plaintiff initiated the lawsuit on behalf of himself and 418 other individuals, referred to as the "Other Investors" listed in Appendix A of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
