HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SITI SAKINAH MEOR OMAR BAKI – Appellant
Versus
ZAMIHAN MAT ZIN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. organizations can pursue defamation claims affecting goodwill. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. non-trading corporations can sue for defamation. (Para 2) |
| 3. defendants denied statements, establishing credibility issues. (Para 10 , 12 , 20) |
| 4. criteria for establishing defamation against individuals and organizations. (Para 23 , 25 , 28) |
| 5. plaintiff proved essential elements of defamation. (Para 24 , 31) |
[1] This is a defamation case. The plaintiff is the chairman of an organization known as Syria Care, which was estab-lished under the Societies Act 1966 (the SA ) and is filing the action in this suit in her capacity as the public officer of Syria Care under s 9(c) of the same.
[2] Before I proceed in deliberating the evidence given at the trial and the liability of the parties herein, let me dispose a preliminary issue, even though it has not been canvassed by the parties. It is this. Can the plaintiff, being a society un-der the SA , institute an action in defamation? In other words, does Syria Care have the necessary locus to maintain this action?
[3] The short answer to this can be found in proposition of law as expounded by the Court of Appeal in the case of Amber Court Man
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.