Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
JEREMY SWEE TECK HEANNE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
COLLIN SWEE LAY KEONG – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. plaintiffs allege mismanagement by defendant (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. legal standards for revocation of executor's grant (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court tests for sufficient cause (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. defendant's management of insurance policy funds (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. breach of civil law and insurance acts (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. executor's duty to provide accounts (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. criminal allegation against the defendant (Para 35 , 36) |
| 9. failure to comply with testator's will (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. defendant's negligence towards beneficiaries' welfare (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 11. credibility of parties (Para 45) |
| 12. summary of court's judicial findings (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
[1] This action is brought by the First Plaintiff, Jeremy Swee Teck Heanne ("Jeremy") and the Second Plaintiff, Jonathan Swee Teck Jeanne ("Jonathan") against the Defendant namely Collin Swee Lay Keong who is the uncle of Jeremy and Jonathan by virtue of being the younger brother of the Deceased.
[2] At all material times the First and Second Plaintiffs ("the P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
