SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 91

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAN KOK PIN – Appellant
Versus
LOH CHUN HOO & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Aaron Pang ,Respondent Advocate: Gary Teh

JUDGMENT

John Lee Kien How @ Mohd Johan Lee JC:

(Enclosure 18 - 1st Defendant Striking Out Application, Order 18 Rule 19(1)(a))

Introduction

[1] The 1st Defendant ("D1") filed an application ("this Application") pursuant to O 18 r 19(1) of the Rules of 2012 (" ROC 2012") to strike out the Plaintiff's writ and statement of claim dated 22 February 2021 and 19 March 2021 respectively ("the Suit"). Having read all the submissions by the Parties, I hereby allow the Application. Herein are the judgment.

Facts Of The Case

[2] D1 is an advocate and solicitor of the High Court of Malaya and the 2nd Defendant was his client. On 8 February 2021, the 2nd Defendant had lodged a police report against the Plaintiff and one Gideon ('Gideon') for cheating and master-minding a money game. Subsequently, the 3rd Defendant to 14th Defendant also lodged police reports against the Plaintiff and Gideon.

[3] The Police ('PDRM') later detained the Plaintiff to assist with the investigation. While the Plaintiff was being detained, his sister, Ann, was allegedly approached by the 15th Defendant and was asked to contact D1 on the details and manner to refund the sum owed by the Plaintiff.

[4] On D2's instructions, D1


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top