SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 2470

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
CASMET SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (M) SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Andrew Chan Kah Jun,Queenie Hoh Li Chian ,Respondent Advocate: Deepak Mahadevan

JUDGMENT

(Court Enclosure No 1)

Wong Kian Kheong J:

A. Background

[1] By a "Letter of Award" dated 15 July 2015 (Main Contract), Tujuan Gemilang Sdn Bhd (Employer) had appointed the plaintiff company (Plaintiff) as the main contractor for a construction project (Project). The Main Contract provided in cl 3 [Clause 3 (Main Contract)] as follows:

"3. PAYMENT TO NOMINATED SUB-CONTRACTORS AND NOMINATED SUPPLIERS

Notwithstanding the Conditions of Contract, payments certified for work executed by all Nominated Sub-Contractors and goods supplied by all Nominated Suppliers shall be issued in separate cheques made payable to the respective Nominated Sub-Contractors and Nominated Suppliers. The said cheques shall be issued to the [Plaintiff] for distribution to the respective Nominated Sub-Contractors and Nominated Suppliers. For all purposes and intent of this [Main Contract], all relevant clauses in the Conditions of Contract pertaining to payment to Nominated Sub-Contractors and Nominated Suppliers shall be deemed to have been amended to allow for the payments to be issued to the Nominated Sub-Contractors and Nominated Suppliers in the manner described above."

[Emphasis Added]

[2] The Project's a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top