HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SANGEET KAUR DEO – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA ENCL 12 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the application and background facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments and opposition from both parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of legal principles and relevant provisions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. court's duty to maintain integrity in legal procedures. (Para 13 , 15 , 16) |
[1] The present application before me by way of encl 12 deals with the Respondent's application for the following orders:
(i) That parts of the Affidavit affirmed by Hamid Sultan bin Abu Backer on 14 February 2019 ("Hamid's Affidavit), filed in these proceedings and marked in Appendix A be expunged from the records of this Honourable Court;
(ii) That the costs of this application be borne and paid by Hamid Sultan bin Abu Backer (NRIC: 550828-71-5003), the deponent of Hamid's Affidavit; and
(iii) Such other reliefs as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper.
Brief Facts Of The Case
[2] The salient background facts can succinctly be summarised as follows:
(a) The late Mr Karpal Singh was charged with an offence under the Sedition Act, 1948. At the High Court, at the end of the defence case, he was convicted and sentenced to a fine of RM4000, in default, four months impr
Kassim bin Sulong v. Guthrie Estates Holdings Ltd & Ors
NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading Co v. PT Sampaoerna JL Sdn Bhd
Cahaya Ideal (M) Sdn Bhd v. Orang-Orang yang mengenali diri sebagai 'Ponga' & Ors
Kantan Jaya Marine Services (Pg) Sdn Bhd v. RHB Bank Bhd
Nalakaruppan Solaimalai v. Ketua Pengarah Penjara Malaysia & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.