SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 214

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
PP – Appellant
Versus
MULTI ELECTRICAL SUPPLY & SERVICES & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid JC:

Introduction

[1] The Public Prosecutor ('Applicant') filed an application under s 56(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Financing of Terrorism and Proceeds of Unlawful Activity Act 2001 ('AMLFTA') by way of a Notice of Motion as appearing in encl 1. Essentially the Applicant prayed for this Court to grant an order under s 56(2) of AMLFTA for the forfeiture of monies in bank accounts and of certain movable and immovable properties belonging to the respective respondents named in the Notice of Motion ('Application').

[2] The Application is supported by the Affidavits of Syafinas binti Shabudin for the Applicant (Enclosure 2), Sarjan Mohd Fadzlee bin Mohd Khalid as the Predicate Offence Investigating Officer (Enclosure 3), and Inspector Sopawan A/P Kin as the AMLFTA Investigating Officer (Enclosure 8).

[3] The Application is premised on the grounds that: (a) each of the respondent had committed the predicate offence of participating in, receiving proceeds from and making payments for an unlawful activity of online gambling under s 4B of the Common Gaming Houses Act 1953 (' CGHA '); (b) that the respondents' bank accounts were used to receive unlawful p


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top