SSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD vs TRIDANT ENGINEERING (M) SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 MarsdenLR 2228

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
TRIDANT ENGINEERING (M) SDN BHD – Respondent

Table of Content
1. overview of the arbitration proceedings and summary of the originating summonses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. description of the background facts, including contracts and allegations of payments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. resolution of the principal legal questions regarding the acknowledgment of debts. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. analysis of the terms of arbitration and issues raised by both parties. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)

Mary Lim Thiam Suan J:

[1] The present two Originating Summonses are agreed to be heard together given that both Originating Summonses concerned the same arbitration award.

[2] In Originating Summons No. 24(ARB)-9-03/2015, the Plaintiff, Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co Ltd [Ssangyong] seeks to set aside the Award dated 21 January 2015 under the Arbitration Act 2005 [Act 646] under subparas 37 (1) (a) (iv) and (v); subpara 37 (2) (b) (ii) and para 37 (2) (b). Alternatively, Ssangyong seeks to invoke s 42 of the same Act to refer certain questions of law that it claims arises under the Award. As a consequence to the answer or determination of these questions of law, Ssangyong seeks the consequential order of setting aside of the same A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 MarsdenLR 2228

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURSSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD – AppellantVersusTRIDANT ENGINEERING (M) SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
TRIDANT ENGINEERING (M) SDN BHD – Respondent