SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 439

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PERBADANAN RIADAH SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SETIAUSAHA KERAJAAN NEGERI SELANGOR & ANOR – Respondent
[Suit No: MT2-21-77-2007]



Petitioner Advocates:N Suhendran,Edwin Lim ,Respondent Advocate: M Indrani

The obligation to pay land premium is independent from the obligation to deliver vacant possession, and a failure to provide possession constitutes a breach of contract.

Headnote:(A) Contracts Act 1950 - Sections 52, 55 - Breach of joint venture agreement - Defendants liable for failing to provide vacant possession of land after 6 months of execution as per the Joint-Venture Agreement - Plaintiff prevented from developing project due to illegal mining activities - The obligation to pay land premium is independent of Defendants’ obligation to deliver possession. (Paras 26-36)

(B) The court affirmed that the failure to give vacant possession constituted a breach of contract, and delays caused by the Defendants are significant in assessing liability and damages. (Paras 26-36)

Facts of the case:
The joint venture aimed at developing a project on land with ongoing illegal mining activities, which impeded progress. Various correspondences highlighted the Plaintiff's complaints regarding possession and project progression. (Paras 9-20)

Findings of Court:
The First Defendant breached the Joint-Venture Agreement; thus, the Plaintiff is entitled to compensation for damages, while claims against the Second Defendant were dismissed. (Paras 26-38)

Issues: The main issues addressed included the liability for failure to provide vacant possession and whether the land premium payment was a condition precedent to possession. (Paras 28-36)

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that reciprocal obligations were dependent on each other's fulfillment; however, the obligation to pay land premium did not affect the delivery of vacant possession by the First Defendant, thus affording the Plaintiff entitlement to damages. (Paras 32-36)

Result: The First Defendant is liable for compensation; the claim against the Second Defendant is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. outline of parties involved in joint venture. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. trial process and witness testimony. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. details and terms of the joint-venture agreement. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. plaintiff's claims of defendants' breach. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. defendants' arguments against plaintiff's claims. (Para 24 , 25)
6. court's findings on breach of contract. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)

[1] This is a contract action for breach of a joint venture agreement to develop a housing and industrial project in Sepang, Selangor.

[2] The Plaintiff is a private limited company involved in the business of industrial property development.

[3] The First Defendant is an incorporated body of the Selangor State Government pursuant to the Selangor State Enactment.

[4] The Second Defendant is a private limited company owned by the Selangor State Government.

The Trial Process

[5] By consent of the parties, the trial at this stage is on liability only with damages to be subsequently assessed depending on the outcome of the trial.

[6] The trial was conducted on 9 and 10 June 2014. The trial documents were marked as bundles A to D with the documentary evidence wholly contained in bundle B.

[7] The following witnesses testified at the trial for the respective parties:

i) Kenny Lim Kah Joo (PW1) who is a director of the Plaintiff; and

ii) Md Yunus @ Iskandar bin Md Noor (DW1) who was the project manager of the Defendants.

[8] After the conclusion of the trial, the Parties submitted their respective closing written arguments. There was oral clarification with counsel held on 12 July 2014.

Background Facts

[9] By a written joint venture agreement dated 7 April 1995 ("Joint-Venture Agreement") the parties agreed to jointly carry out housing and industrial development ("Project Development") on the land at Lot 5317, Mukim Dengkil, Daerah Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan ("Land"). At that time, sand mining activities were being carried out on the Land.

[10] The First Defendant is the beneficial owner of the Land for which separate documents of titles were in the process of issuance by the State Authority. The First Defendant assigned all its rights, benefits and obligations of the Land to the Second Defendant.

[11] The material terms of the Joint-Venture Agreement (where the Plaintiff is referred to as the Company and the First Defendant as the Corporation therein respectively) are as follows with the necessary emphasis added:

Formal Approval By The Corporation Of Plans

2(i) The Company shall within Three (3) months from the date of this Agreement at their own cost and expenses prepare and submit to the Corporation for the Corporation's formal approval the layout plans, elevations, sections, drawings and other relevant plans, if any, in duplicate of the buildings, erections and structures to be put up on the Land together with an outline of the specifications of the proposed method of construction to be employed and the materials to be used.

Submission Of Layout Plan To The Government Authorities

2(ii) The Company shall immediately upon the Corporation having formally approved the plans as in sub-clause (i) above submit the layout plans of the Housing & Industrial Development to the relevant Government Authorities and shall endeavour to obtain such Authorities approval of the plans. The Corporation undertakes to assist the Company and its endeavour to obtain necessary approvals from the relevant Authorities if its assistance in necessary. Provided that where a delay is occasioned through no fault of the Company the Corporation shall allow the Company such further time as may be reasonable to obtain such approval. Such extension of time given hereunder shall be writing.

Submission Of Building Plan Etc To Government Authorities

2(iii) Upon the relevant Government Authorities approval as in sub-clause (ii) above having been obtained the Company shall submit to the Authorities for t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top