SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 171

HIGH COURT SABA & SARAWAK KUCHING
ROKIAH SUHAILI – Appellant
Versus
EMLY BATU BAGANG & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff claims for return of land or damages. (Para 1 , 1 , 2)
2. third and fourth defendants claim good faith. (Para 3)

[1] In this action the plaintiff is claiming for the return of her land that was sold to the third defendant and subsequently to the fourth defendant. In the alternative she is claiming for damages. The land was sold to the third defendant through a power of attorney that she had executed in favour of the first defendant. It is alleged that the first defendant and the second defendant had committed fraud by selling the land to the third defendant. The plaintiff had already entered judgment in default against the first and second defendants and the instant trial proceeded against the third and fourth defendants only.

The Brief Facts Of The Plaintiff's Claim

[2] The plaintiff (Rokiah bt Suhaili) testified on her own behalf and called one other witness. Her evidence can be summarised as follows. She is a native of Sarawak. She was the owner of a parcel of land known as Lot 451, Block 17 Salak Land District which is classified as native area land. It is 8,134 sq m in size. The first defendant (Emily Batu ak Bagang) is also a native of Sarawak. She tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top