SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 2604

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ZAQ CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PUTRAJAYA HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. establishment of plaintiffs' claim context (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. defendant's grounds for applying for a stay (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. plaintiffs' opposition to the stay application (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. court's agreement with defendant's stance (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
5. understanding of mandatory nature of arbitration (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
6. interpretation of arbitration agreements (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
7. rules surrounding admission and dispute ownership (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
8. considerations on set-off validity (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
9. exploration of exceptions under arbitration clause (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
10. legal precedents informing current disputes (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68)
11. clarifications on inoperability and performance incapacity (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
12. comparison with relevant case law outcomes (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77)
13. court's evaluation of arbitration agreement protocols (Para 78 , 79 , 80 , 81)
14. court's perspective on arbitration clarity (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86)
15. judgement o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top