Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
DC CONTRACTOR SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITI PERTAHANAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the project and contract. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of delays and breach of contract notices. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. claims by plaintiff regarding terminations and delays. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. defendant's counterclaims and arguments concerning validity of terminations. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. defendant's counterclaims (Para 17) |
| 6. witness testimonies highlighting delays and work progress. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. impact of delay on project completion and claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. court’s interpretation of termination validity. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 9. defendant's defenses against termination claims (Para 52 , 53) |
| 10. court's interpretation of termination clause (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
Background Facts
[1] The Plaintiff successfully tendered for a project to build and upgrade several structures in the Defendant's Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia for a total value of RM4,950,810.00 [the project]. Specifically, the structures were the Bilik Pengawal, Pondok Pengawal, Setor Senjata as well as the Jalan Masuk Utama to the University. For this, the Defendant issued the Pl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
