SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 1696

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAN KOK PIN – Appellant
Versus
LOH CHUN HOO & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Aaron Pang ,Respondent Advocate: Koh Mui Woon

JUDGMENT

[2nd Defendant's Application Pursuant To Order 18 Rule 19(1) Of The Rules Of 2012 - Enclosure 58]

Johan Lee Kien How @ Mohd Johan Lee JC:

Introduction

[1] The 2nd Defendant ("D2") filed an application ("the Application") pursuant to O 18 r 19(1) of the Rules of 2012 (" ROC 2012") to strike out the Plaintiff's writ and statement of claim dated 22 February 2021 and 19 March 2021 respectively ("the Suit"). Having read all the submissions by the Parties, I hereby allow the Application. Herein are the judgment.

Facts Of The Case

[2] D2 subscribed and/or invested monies in the Click Subscription Plan. Click Subscription Plan was offered by the Plaintiff's company known as Click Internet Traffic Sdn Bhd ("Click") through an online application where certain returns on investment were offered to investors.

[3] After a period of time, the Plaintiff alleged that the Click application had been hacked. Based on that reason, the Plaintiff stopped paying subscribers their returns on investments. D2 demanded for the refund of his capital investments and for his down lines. The Plaintiff had refused and/or failed to do so. D2 and the other Defendants then lodged police reports against the Plain


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top