Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
N VASANTHA RAJAN NAGARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
YEOH SOON PENG & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of application and appeal process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. status and preparation for upcoming trial. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. application for stay of proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. history of prior proceedings and appeals. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. details of estate and claims. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. court's discretion in granting stay. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. grounds for stay of trial. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. assessment of grounds for stay. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 9. evaluation of potential outcomes and prejudice. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
(Stay Pending Appeal)
Prelusion
[1] On 21 July 2023, I dismissed the Plaintiff's (P) application under Order 33 of the Rules Of Court 2012 to pose certain questions to Court. If the answers to the questions favour P, then P sought an Order to enter Judgment against the 2nd Defendant (D2).
[2] As I dismissed P's application, P appealed to the Court Of Appeal.
[3] P then files this application to stay all the proceedings in this suit until his appeal to the Court Of Appeal is determined.
[4] Should I allow the stay?
The Current St
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
