SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 58

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
GAN CHIA BEE & ORS – Appellant
Versus
GAN THAY KAI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the case involves a dispute over the enforcement of a consent judgment among siblings regarding property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. the defendant claims that the plaintiffs lack standing and have waived their rights. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. dispute on the enforceability of the consent judgment and standing to sue. (Para 11)
4. the court discusses the criteria for extending time for filing submissions. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25)
5. legal principles governing extensions in case law regarding time compliance. (Para 41)
6. the court affirms the enforceability of the consent judgment to require compliance among all intended beneficiaries. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
7. discussion on the nature and implications of consent judgments and trusts. (Para 49 , 51 , 52 , 56 , 60)

[1] The Plaintiffs and the Defendant in the Suit herein are all siblings.

[2] The claim of the Plaintiffs here is based on a consent judgment dated 31 January 2013 in another case (Johor Bahru Suit No. 23NCVC-125-08/2012) ("the Other Suit") between Tan Poh Ning, as plaintiff, and Gan Thay Liong & 4 others, as defendants.

[3] Tan Poh Ning, who is now deceased, is the mother to all the Plaintiffs an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top