Back
HIGH COURT SHAH ALAM SELANGOR
AMIRUL HAKIM DZULKEFLY – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charge and applicable sections of the penal code. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appellant's appeal against sentencing. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's powers regarding child offenders. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. summary of grounds of appeal. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. factors influencing sentencing objectives. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. seriousness of offence must outweigh mitigating factors. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. consideration of probation report's findings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. precedents regarding children in criminal cases. (Para 24) |
[1] The charge in the Sessions Court against the child abovenamed as read in Bahasa Malaysia was as follows:
"Bahawa kamu bersama-sama 2 orang lagi yang masih bebas pada 21 Januari 2014, jam lebih kurang 1815hrs di Jalan Mahagoni 3A/1, Batang Kali, di dalam daerah Hulu Selangor, dalam negeri Selangor telah melakukan rompak bersenjata parang dan telah melarikan sebuah telefon bimbit jenama Nokia warna hitam model 202, milik (1) lelaki India nama : KPL RF/113462 Aruldass a/l Appadorai sehingga menyebabkan kerugian sebanyak RM263. Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah s 395/397 Kanun Keseksaan dan boleh dihukum di b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
