SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 1665

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MAYBANK INTERNATIONAL (L) LTD – Appellant
Versus
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. claim for guaranteed loan amount by plaintiff (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. borrower defaults due to political turmoil (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17)
3. defendant's argument on surety duties (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. requirements for creating a valid mortgage in thailand (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 35 , 38)

[1] The plaintiff is claiming for a sum of USD5,975,377.02 which represent 95% of the total outstanding amount due and owing by one Bitumen Bales (Laem Chabang) Co Ltd (the Borrower) to the plaintiff, in respect of a term loan facility which the plaintiff had granted to the Borrower and guaranteed by the defendant.

Defendant's Defence

[2] Although the defendant does not dispute the Guarantee, the defendant relies on s 92 of the Contracts Act 1950 and contends that its liability to pay the sum claimed is discharged as the plaintiff has breached the terms of the Guarantee when it failed, among others, to:

(a) Obtain certain security to the facility; and

(b) safeguard the Borrower's Machinery intended as security to the facilities, from being dissipated.

Witnesses

[3] 8 witnesses were produced by the respective parties to give evidence at the trial, 5 for the pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top