SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 1466

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
OM CAHAYA MINERAL ASIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
DAMANSARA REALTY (PAHANG) SDN BHD (ENCL 10) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background and basis of claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's final decision and rationale. (Para 15 , 34 , 49)
3. legal obligations under agreements regarding licensing. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 31 , 32)
4. consequences of illegal agreements. (Para 38)
Yeoh Wee Siam J:

Enclosure 10

[1] Enclosure 10 is the Defendant's Application to strike out the Plaintiff's Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim under O 18 r 19(b), (c) and/or (d) of the Rules of 2012 ("ROC"), and for costs ("the Application").

Background Facts

[2] The Plaintiff is a company carrying on a business which includes preparing the site for construction, cut and fill works, site clearance, mineral extraction and the mineral export business.

[3] The Defendant is the registered owner of a parcel of land known as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 12 and 18 located at Mukim Sungai Karang, Daerah Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur measuring approximately 500 acres ("the Land").

[4] Vide a Letter of Intent dated 3 December 2014 ("LOI 1") issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, the Defendant invited the Plaintiff to venture into a contract for the Plaintiff to do site clearance, extract mineral, and undertake a proper cut a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top