HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
OM CAHAYA MINERAL ASIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
DAMANSARA REALTY (PAHANG) SDN BHD (ENCL 10) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and basis of claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's final decision and rationale. (Para 15 , 34 , 49) |
| 3. legal obligations under agreements regarding licensing. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. consequences of illegal agreements. (Para 38) |
Enclosure 10
[1] Enclosure 10 is the Defendant's Application to strike out the Plaintiff's Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim under O 18 r 19(b), (c) and/or (d) of the Rules of 2012 ("ROC"), and for costs ("the Application").
Background Facts
[2] The Plaintiff is a company carrying on a business which includes preparing the site for construction, cut and fill works, site clearance, mineral extraction and the mineral export business.
[3] The Defendant is the registered owner of a parcel of land known as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 12 and 18 located at Mukim Sungai Karang, Daerah Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur measuring approximately 500 acres ("the Land").
[4] Vide a Letter of Intent dated 3 December 2014 ("LOI 1") issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, the Defendant invited the Plaintiff to venture into a contract for the Plaintiff to do site clearance, extract mineral, and undertake a proper cut a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.