SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 2347

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHOONG HOWEI – Appellant
Versus
CHEAH CHOO ENG & ORS AND ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. two appeals regarding egm decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. court dismissed the irregularity claims against a previous order. (Para 6 , 7)
Mohd Hishamudin Yunus JCA:

Introduction

[1] There are two appeals before us, namely:-

(1) Civil Appeal No B-02-2785-11/2012 ('Appeal 2785'); and

(2) Civil Appeal No B-02-2786-11/2012 ('Appeal 2786').

[2] They were heard together

[3] These appeals arose from a decision of the High Court of Shah Alam of 22 October 2012 on an Originating Summons application by the respondents in the appeals, namely, Shah Alam High Court Originating Summons No: 242399-09-2011 ('OS 2399'). The respondents are the plaintiffs in OS 2399.

[4] The High Court of Shah Alam, by its decision of 22 October 2012, had allowed the respondents'/plaintiffs' application in OS 2399; and had made the following Order:-

(1) An order declaring that the decision taken and resolutions passed at the Extraordinary General Meeting of Wilayah Car Pool Berhad on 17 September 2009 ('the EGM') is valid and enforceable in law.

(2) An Order that the Companies Commission of Malaysia do register the Form 48A and Form 49 of Wilayah Car Pool Berhad ('the Company') in respect of the result of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top