Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SIVASUBRAMANIAM SIVAYOGARAJASINGAM & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
SAUMIAN SIVAYOGARAJASINGAM & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for transfer of case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties' conflicting versions of events. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defendants' arguments against transfer. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's analysis of transfer powers. (Para 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 5. court of appeal's precedent on transfer. (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 6. clarification of jurisdictional principles. (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. limitations on cross-territory transfers. (Para 24 , 26 , 34) |
| 8. interpretation of statutory definitions. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 9. requirement for consolidation before transfer. (Para 40 , 41) |
| 10. factors to consider for transfer. (Para 44 , 46 , 48) |
| 11. overview of related civil suits. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 12. analysis of interrelated suits. (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 13. conclusion on transfer of ncvc10 suit. (Para 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 14. final order on costs. (Para 67) |
Introduction
[1] Enclosure 58 is an application by the Plaintiff to transfer the present NCvC10 suit here to Shah Alam High Court NCvC3 so that it can be heard and decided by the same Judge as two other pending suits in NCvC3.
[2] Apart from the two other suits pending in NCvC3 and this NCvC10 suit, there is also another pendin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
