ABDUL HAMID EMBONG
ASBIR HIRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SUPRAMANIAM PITCHAIMUTHU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case regarding the fee agreement and actions leading to this injunction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
Abdul Hamid Embong J:
By an ex parte summons in chambers (encl. 3), the plaintiff, a legal firm, sought for the following orders:
1. To declare that the agreement dated 17 February 1992 for the fees of sum of RM40,000 between the plaintiff and the first defendant is fair and reasonable and is enforceable by the plaintiff against the first defendant.
2. Further or alternatively, the plaintiff do tax its Bills of Costs on solicitorclient basis against the first and second defendants and recover such taxed costs from the funds standing to the account of the first and second defendants with the third, fourth and fifth defendants or if the same is insufficient, the first and second defendants to pay to the plaintiff the taxed costs.
3. An injunction to restrain the first and second defendants whether by themselves or their servants or agents or otherwise from making any attempts to withdraw the sums of money standing in the respective accounts with the third, fourth and fifth defendants pending the complete disposal of this action. 4. The third, fourth and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.