Back
MAHKAMAH MAJISTRET KLUANG
PERNIAGAAN CHUAN SENG & SATU LAGI LWN. AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs' claim for damages. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defendant's valid reasons for repudiating the claim. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. notification requirements under the insurance policy. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. agency principles in insurance notifications. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. legal implications of agency notifications. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. estoppel principles in insurance claims. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. standard of proof in civil cases. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. admissibility of evidence in court. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 9. requirement for expert testimony in technical cases. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 10. burden of proof in civil litigation. (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 11. credibility of witness testimonies. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 12. requirements for special damages. (Para 63 , 67 , 74 , 76 , 78) |
Pengenalan
[1] Dalam kes ini, Plaintif-plaintif menuntut daripada Defendan untuk ganti rugi khas berjumlah RM38,720.74 yang merupakan kos bagi membaiki forklift, RM14,000.00 bagi kehilangan kegunaan kenderaan tersebut dan kos sewaan kenderaan ganti, ganti rugi teruk, ganti rugi teladan, faedah
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
