Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LOH SIEW HONG – Appellant
Versus
NAGAHSWARAN MUNIANDY; MAJLIS AGAMA ISLAM DAN ADAT ISTIADAT MELAYU PERLIS (MAIPS) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interrelated applications by petitioner and respondent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of marriage and custody issues. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. respondent's delay in filing and its implications. (Para 12 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. petitioner's efforts to comply with court orders. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. compliance with procedural requirements for committal. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. knowledge of court orders as key factor in contempt. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. criteria for contempt based on knowledge of orders. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 8. importance of upholding justice and court orders. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. consequences of respondent's non-compliance. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 10. power of the court to impose sanctions for contempt. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 11. respondent's lack of remorse affects sentencing. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 12. final decision on committal and penalties imposed. (Para 47) |
Introduction
[1] These were applications by the Petitioner wife in encl 100, and the Respondent in encl 103. The Petitioner's application was for committal proceedings ("the Committal Application") against the Respondent husband for brea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
