NUR HAZIYAH ZAINOL ABIDIN vs HELIOS PHOTOVOLTAIC SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1320

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
NUR HAZIYAH ZAINOL ABIDIN – Appellant
Versus
HELIOS PHOTOVOLTAIC SDN BHD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Munjit Singh ,Respondent Advocate:

Table of Content
1. court's jurisdiction in dismissal cases (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. claimant's employment history and grievances (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. remedies sought by the claimant (Para 19 , 24)
4. role of the industrial court and burden of proof (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. conditions for constructive dismissal (Para 25 , 27 , 28)
6. court's findings on constructive dismissal (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
7. remedy awarded to the claimant (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)

Nur Fauzah Mokhtar

Reference

[1] This is a reference from the Director General for Industrial Relations to the Industrial Court of Malaysia under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 [Act 177] in respect of the dismissal of NUR HAZIYAH BINTI ZAINOL ABIDIN ("the Claimant") by HELIOS PHOTOVOLTAIC SDN BHD ("the Company") on 11 November 2021.

[2] This matter was initially fixed for hearing on 24 February 2023 and 8 March 2023. Both hearing dates were postponed to 9 August 2023. The Claimant and/or representative of the Claimant were present at all mention dates. The Claimant had also duly filed her Statement of Case, Bundle of Documents and Witness Statement as directed by the Court.

[

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1320

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPURNUR HAZIYAH ZAINOL ABIDIN – AppellantVersusHELIOS PHOTOVOLTAIC SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
NUR HAZIYAH ZAINOL ABIDIN – Appellant
Versus
HELIOS PHOTOVOLTAIC SDN BHD – Respondent