Back
SESSION COURT SHAH ALAM
LEAN BROTHERS TRANSPORT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MOHD DAUD KASIM & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for outstanding sum owed (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. background facts of the case (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. key issue is d3's signature (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence and credibility (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. burden of proof considerations (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. inconsistencies in witness testimonies (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 7. issues with statutory declarations (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 8. credibility of witnesses assessed (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 9. legal standards for proving signatures (Para 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
| 10. final ruling and order (Para 74) |
A. Introduction
[1] This action is emanated from a claim for outstanding sum owed by the Defendants' company known as Eminent Ventures Sdn Bhd to the Plaintiff's company. The Plaintiff brought this action against the third Defendant as he is one of the guarantor for the said company in a building material supply transaction.
[2] After full trial, this court allowed the Plaintiff's claim. Dissatisfied, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
