Back
J.R.MUDHOLKAR, K.SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
A. RAGHAVAMMA – Appellant
Versus
A. Chenchamma – Respondent
Judgment
K. SUBBA RAO, J.
( 1 ) THIS appeal by certificate is preferred against the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Andhra confirming those of the Subordinate Judge, Bapatla, dismissing the suit filed by the appellants for possession of the plaint schedule properties. The following genealogy will be useful in appreciating the facts and the contentions of the parties. IT will be seen from genealogy that Veeranna had two wives and that Chimpirayya and Pitchayya were his sons by the first wife and Peda Punnayya and China Punnayyas were his sons by the second wife. Veeranna died in the year 1906 and his second son Pitchayya had predeceased him on 1-9-1905 leaving his widow Raghavamma. It is alleged that sometime before his death, Pitchayya took Venkayya, the son of his brother Chimprirayya in adoption; and it is also alleged that in or about the year 1895, there was a partition of the joint family properties between Veranna and his four sons, Chimpirayya, Pitchayya, Peda Punnayya and China Punnayya, Veeranna taking only 4 acres of land and the rest of the property being divided between the four sons by metes and bounds. Venkayya died on 24/05/1938, leaving behind a son Subbarao.
[No cases identified as bad law. None of the snippets contain keywords or phrases indicating that any case has been overruled, reversed, abrogated, criticized, questioned, or otherwise treated as bad law. All references appear affirmative.]
Madhusudan Das VS Narayanibai - 1982 0 Supreme(SC) 217: Cited alongside other cases in a neutral/affirmative context ("Raghavamma v. Chenchamma. (AIR 1964 SC 136) (supra)"), implying reliance or following.
State of U. P. VS Presiding Officer Labour Court - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 1863: Explicitly states "followed in R.V.E." and quotes the case.
State of U. P. VS Presiding Officer Labour Court - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 2462: Explicitly states "followed in R.V.E." and quotes the case.
Rameswar Dubey VS Mahesh Chand Gupta (Dead) Through L. Rs. - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 486: States "This view is supported by the judgment... in the case of Addagada Raghavamma", indicating affirmative support/following.
Sangeeta Jain VS State Of U. P. - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 2544: States "Apex Court propounded", indicating the case is followed as authoritative.
P. Periasami and others VS P. Periathambi and others - 1979 0 Supreme(Mad) 12: Cites "Subba Rao, J., in Raghavamma" as authority for a legal principle, with "(supra)" implication in context.
Kahandu Daulat Dangde VS Jay Wantrao Yadavrao Kharade - 1996 2 Supreme 101: Lists as a key case alongside others in a string citation.
Mahavir Jangonda Patil VS Director Of Resettlement - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 799: Refers to the judgment and contrasts appellant's submission "in view of the judgment of this Court in Addagada Raghavamma", showing reliance.
RAJSHREE MINERALS VS KARMAVIR SINGH - 2010 0 Supreme(MP) 93: Quotes extensively from the case ("was pleased to observe"), indicating approval.
Areva T & D India Ltd. VS R. Govindrajan - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 210: Cites with page reference ("@ 143"), typical of reliance.
Man Mohan Singh (deceased) through his LRs Smt. Asha Devi VS Gopi Chand (deceased) through his LRs Sh. Daneshwar Singh - 2014 0 Supreme(HP) 1533: Cited in string with other cases.
MASTER DHIRAJ RAJESH HUKMATANI VS AHMEDABAD CO. OPERATIVE STORES LTD. - Consumer (2018): Direct citation in parentheses.
Kalyan Singh VS Sanjeev Singh - 2018 0 Supreme(MP) 347: States "as held in Addagada Raghavamma v. A.Chenchamma... has held", indicating holding is followed.
Union Of India VS Imtiaz Iqbal Pothiawala - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2684: Cites for legal distinction ("there is an essential distinction"), relying on it.
Union Of India VS Imtiaz Iqbal Pothiawala Crystal Tower - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 3032: Cites for legal distinction ("there is an essential distinction"), relying on it.
Satish Kumar VS Sarjo Devi - 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1795: States "it was laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court", indicating authoritative laying down of law.
Pandhari VS Vithoba - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1437: Cites as "[supra]", direct reliance.
IN RE : Hoffland Finance Ltd. VS . - 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1784: Cited in string.
Maharashtra Gramin Bank VS Bharatibai Ramesh Kambale - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2589: Direct citation in parentheses.
R. Venkata Ramanrao VS Chanumolu Chit Funds (P) Ltd. - 2020 0 Supreme(AP) 182: Cited as "V." with AIR reference.
D. M. Finance (Partnership Firm) Jayesh D Thakkar - Manager VS State of Gujarat - Crimes (2020): Direct citation.
D M Finance (Partnership Firm) Jayesh D Thakkar, Manager VS State Of Gujarat - 2020 0 Supreme(Guj) 956: Direct citation.
V. Kalyanaswamy(D) By Lrs. VS L. Bakthavatsalam(D) By Lrs. - 2020 5 Supreme 641: "Reliance is placed in Addagada Raghavamma", explicit reliance.
Reserve Bank Of India VS JVG Finance Ltd. - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 782: Cited in string.
<02100138062]: States "as held in Addagada Raghavamma... there is an essential", indicating holding relied upon.
Narendra Singh Panwar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2020 0 Supreme(MP) 1178: Quotes extensively ("has held as under"), indicating reliance.
B. Ranga Swam VS Secy. Revenue Dept. Hyd. - 2021 0 Supreme(Telangana) 122: Cited in string.
Rabari Nagjibhai Maneklal VS Nilamben Upendrabhai Shah - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 319: Cites for legal distinction ("there is an essential distinction"), relying on it.
Chowa Ram S/o Mangluram Verma VS Sanjay Kumar S/o Ranjedet Kumar - 2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 187: Cited in string.
Shah Ashokkumar Ramniklal VS Shah Hasmukhlal Shivlal - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 766: Direct citation ("reported in").
Smriti Debbarma (Dead) Through Legal Representative VS Prabha Ranjan Debbarma - 2023 1 Supreme 140: Cites in footnote with "See", indicating reference.
Ramachandran VS Vijayan - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1075: Lists in string citation.
Chowdamma (D) by LRs. VS Venkatappa (D) by LRs. - 2025 8 Supreme 268: Quotes extensively ("this Court observed"), indicating reliance.
Vikas Singh VS Devesh Pratap Singh - 2001 0 Supreme(Pat) 92: Partial title only ("Raghavamma & anr. V/s. A."), no treatment language.
Sethukandiapan VS Jagadambal and others - 2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 322: Listed in numbered citation string, neutral.
Rayadurgam Subramanyam VS Rayadurgam Gangaiah - 2020 0 Supreme(AP) 332: Listed in string citation with other cases.
Mohammad Abrar VS State of U. P. - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 2223: Standalone citation, no explicit treatment.
Maharashtra Gramin Bank Through Its Chairman VS Bharatibai Ramesh Kambale - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2321: Paraphrases holding in parentheses, affirmative but brief.
Bhagwati Prasad Sah VS Dulhin Rameshwari Kuer - 1951 0 Supreme(SC) 41: Mentions contextually re: proof of separation (last entry), but no direct treatment of this case; appears descriptive.
[None. All cases have sufficient contextual language to categorize based on explicit citation patterns, quotes, or phrases like "as held," "reliance," "supra," or "followed." No ambiguous treatments observed.]
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
