SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2183

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ZAINAL AZAHAR MOHD ZAIN – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH SEBERANG PERAI UTARA PULAU PINANG – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court allowed remittance to judge for severance consideration. (Para 1 , 3)
2. claim for injurious affection permissible in reference. (Para 2)
3. injurious affection relevant under the act. (Para 4 , 5)

[1] This appeal was disposed by us on 24th October 2016 wherein we had allowed the appeal and directed that the matter be sent back to the learned Judge to consider the issue of severance and injurious affection under reference proceedings. We append below our grounds for so doing. We will refer to parties as they were described in the High Court.

Facts

[2] The facts of the case can be elucidated from the Grounds of Judgement of the learned High Court Judge.

Essentially, Lot 3822 Mukim 03, Daerah Seberang Perai Utara, Pulau Pinang was gazetted for acquisition for the purposes of "Projek Tambahan Ban Merentasi Kolam (Bahagian Kedah dan Pulau Pinang) Pakej 2B Hulu, Projek Tambatan Banjir Sungai Muda" on 7 November 2013.

One Ng Aik Pang and Zainal Azahar bin Mohd Zain (the Plaintiffs herein) owned each 1/3 and 2/3 parts of the said lot. The whole 0.3192 hectare of the said lot was acquired fully. The evidence given by the Government's Assessor showed that the said lot comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top