SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 1189

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
VIKKARAM SUBRAMANIAM – Appellant
Versus
YOGESWERY SARKGUNALINGAM – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Kalyana Sundram ,Respondent Advocate: Chinnapalani Devi Arumugam

[1] This is a single divorce petition (encl 1) filed by the petitioner husband ("PH") against the respondent wife ("RW"), seeking an order for the dissolution of their marriage, custody, care and control of the children of the marriage be given to RW, PH be given reasonable access and other prayers.

[2] On 6 October 2017 (hearing date), parties (in the presence of their respective counsels) have amicably agreed to part of the prayers to which a consent order was entered between them. The terms of the consent order were (signed by PH and RW) marked as encl 58.

[3] The relevant cause papers and written submissions, are as follows:

(1) PH filed amended petition on 15 July 2016 (encl 18);

(2) RW's reply to the amended petition and cross petition filed on 26 August 2016 (encl 20);

(3) RW's reply to the amended petition and cross petition filed on 26 August 2016 (encl 21);

(4) PH's reply to the cross petition dated 2 March 2016 (encl 22);

(5) RW's reply to the reply for cross petition dated 4 October 2016 (encl 23);

(6) RW's further reply to the reply for cross petition filed 9 December 2016 (encl 26);

(7) RW's further reply to the reply for cross petition filed 9 December 2016 (encl 27);

(8) PH's

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top