SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 870

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AHMAD RIZAL UMAR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ram Singh,Chen Wen Jye ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Amril Johari

JUDGMENT

Wong Kian Kheong JCA:

A. Introduction

[1] This appeal concerned a police investigating officer (IO) who was charged with murdering his lover but he had however alleged that she was killed by a robber who broke into her home.

[2] A draft copy of this judgment (Draft) had been previously forwarded to Supang Lian and Collin Lawrence Sequerah JJCA. Both my learned sister and brother had agreed with the Draft.

B. Previous proceedings

[3] The appellant (Appellant) was a police inspector who was charged with the murder of one Cik Kartini bt Borhan (Deceased) in Lot 7, Phase 5, Taman Andika, Keningau, Sabah (Premises) on 29 September 2011, between 4.00 am and 5.00 am (Amended Charge), an offence punishable under s 302 of the Penal Code ( PC ).

[4] At the end of the prosecution case, the High Court acquitted and discharged the Appellant of the Amended Charge (High Court's Initial Acquittal and Discharge).

[5] The prosecution's appeal to the Court of Appeal against the High Court's Initial Acquittal and Discharge was dismissed (Court of Appeal's Decision).

[6] Upon further appeal by the prosecution against the Court of Appeal's Decision to the Federal Court, the Federal Court allowed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top