Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
ZUN NASRI KASIM – Appellant
Versus
MALAYSIA LAND PROPERTIES SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference under industrial relations act (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. factual background of the claimant's employment (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. claimant's objections to appraisals and dismissal (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. function of the industrial court (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. court's findings on performance and dismissal (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 6. justification for dismissal of probationers (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 7. assessment of the claimant's performance (Para 51 , 52) |
Reference
[1] This is a reference made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177), arising out of the dismissal of Zun-Nasri Bin Kasim (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by Malaysia Land Properties Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") on 1 March 2023.
[2] The reference by the Director General of Industrial Relations ("DGIR") in this case required the Court to hear and determine the Claimant's complaint of dismissal by the Company on 1 March 2023.
I. Procedural History
[3] The Court received the letter pertaining
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
