YAP YOU JEE vs PP & OTHER APPEALS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 MarsdenLR 1116

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
YAP YOU JEE – Appellant
Versus
PP & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent

Table of Content
1. the origins and fundamental facts of the cheating case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of the deceptive interactions leading to financial loss. (Para 4 , 5 , 10)
3. procedural developments and hearings affecting the case. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
4. amendments and their implications on the case proceedings. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
5. the evaluation of evidence and common intention in the cheating scheme. (Para 47 , 50 , 63)

Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat JCA:

Introduction

[1] These three appeals arose out of the decision of the High Court at Johor Bahru in affirming the convictions and sentences passed by the Sessions Court against the three appellants for the offence of cheating. The original charges against the appellants read:

(a) The 1^st appellant

"Bahawa kamu di antara 28 Jun 1995 hingga 25 Julai 1995, di Hotel Hyatt Regency, Jalan Sungai Chat, di dalam daerah Johor Bahru, di dalam negeri Johor, telah menipu Dato' Ding Lian Cheon(No K/P: K314993) seorang pengarah syarikat Solid Estate (Sarawak) Sdn Bhd dengan memperdayakan beliau, supaya mempercayai bahawa kamu telah mendapatkan kelulusan dari Majlis Mesyuarat Negeri Johor untuk permohonan pembelian tanah di Lot 21448 dan Lot 1152, di J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 MarsdenLR 1116

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAYAP YOU JEE – AppellantVersusPP & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
YAP YOU JEE – Appellant
Versus
PP & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent