Back
HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KOTA KINABALU
PP – Appellant
Versus
OMMAR YACOB – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the murder (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. establishing prima facie case (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. forensic evidence of injuries and cause of death (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. accused's confession and admissibility (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. credibility of prosecution witnesses (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. mens rea and intention of the accused (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. defense claims and rebuttals (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 8. accused's testimony and self-defense claim (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 9. assessment of self-defense claim (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79) |
| 10. finding of guilt and sentencing (Para 92 , 93 , 94) |
[1] Ommar Bin Yacob (hereafter 'the accused') is charged with having murdered one Jully Bin Martin (hereafter 'Jully') between 1.00 pm and 3.00 pm on 12 May 2007 at Room No 10, 2nd Floor, Lot 34, Lorong 4, Bandaran Berjaya, Kota Kinabalu (hereafter 'Room 10').
[2] The evidence adduced in the prosecution case shows that at the material time, Room 10 was occupied by a lady named Aramah Bte Angian (PW 14) (hereafter 'Aramah'). The accused and Jully were not st
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
