Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SOO AH LAI & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of trafficking allegation (Para 1 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. overview of charges and initial proceedings (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. defects in charges against appellants (Para 10 , 12 , 25) |
| 4. grounds of appeal presented by the appellants (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. analysis of legal standards on charge defects (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. court's findings on the charges' validity (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. exploitation definitions and arguments presented (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. summary of complainant's evidence of working conditions (Para 29 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. incidents of alleged abuse described (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 10. court's assessment of contract and complainant's consent (Para 38) |
| 11. legal understanding of consent and employment terms (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 12. court's conclusions on trafficking definitions and relevance (Para 42) |
| 13. ill treatment does not equate to trafficking (Para 43) |
| 14. final decisions and implications of the judgment (Para 44) |
[1] Soo Ah Lai ("the 1st appellant"), Yap Siew Ling ("the 2nd appellant") and Yap Siew Lee ("the 3rd appellant") were charged with three separate charges under s 13 of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
