COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NGAN SIONG HING – Appellant
Versus
RHB BANK BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. understanding the appeal and issues raised (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the transaction and concerns regarding conveyancing (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. challenges regarding searches and conveyancing practice (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. claims of breach of contract and duty of care (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. arguments against the findings of negligence (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. legal maxims referred to in case (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. role of causation in determining liability (Para 26 , 27) |
[1] The appellants (solicitor) appeal to set aside the judgment of the High Court in favour of the respondent came up for hearing on 4 November 2013. The appeal involved important principles relating to conveyancing practice. After hearing the submissions we reserved the judgment to 2 December 2013. My learned brother Abdul Wahab bin Patail JCA has read the draft judgment and approved the same. This is our majority judgment.
[2] The memorandum of appeal inter alia reads as follows:
"1. The learned judge erred in law and fact when he injudiciously failed to consider the appellants plea of volenti non fit injuria as pleaded in para 24 of the amended statement of defence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.