HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEOLARIS (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BUMIPUTRA COMMERCE BANK BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim details and losses. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendant's breach of duty and authority. (Para 3) |
| 3. legal principles and related cases. (Para 6) |
"3. The terms of the contract (hereinafter referred to as the said contract) between the plaintiff and the defendant in respect of the opening of the current account referred to in para 2 above are inter alia as follows:
3.1 Express Terms
(a) that the authorised signatories of cheques drawn by the plaintiff are Gordon Stuart Bell, William leslie Addington, John E Dixon and Ling Hee Kiat and
(b) that the signatories for cheques drawn by the plaintiff for RM5,000 and below would be any one of the four authorised signatories and for cheques in excess of RM5,000/- would be any two of the four authorised signatories.
3.2 Implied Terms
(a) that the defendant shall protect the plaintiff from being defrauded and
(b) that the defendant shall only make payments on cheques which are regular and un
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.