SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1438

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
GOH WEE KHIAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conviction of four appellants for murder. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6)
2. conviction for murder following a planned attack. (Para 3 , 4)
3. details of the scheme to harm the deceased. (Para 8 , 9 , 18 , 30)
4. details of conspiracy leading to the murder. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20)
5. witness testimony supporting the prosecution. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. defendants' testimonies and their lack of credibility. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

[1] The four appellants were convicted and sentenced to death by the Kuching High Court for the murder of a young lady, Catherine Chong Jan Jun on 9 August 2007 (the deceased).

[2] The four appellants were separately charged in two separate cases, namely Kuching Criminal Trial No 45-4-2007 and 45-7-2007.

[3] In Kuching Criminal Trial No 45-4-2007 involving the 1st, 2nd and the 3rd appellants, the charge reads:

"That you together with three others, on 9 August 2007 at about 1.30am at a spot at the car part of the Central Park Commercial Centre, in the district of Kuching, in the State of Sarawak, in furtherance of common intention of you all, committed murder by causing the death of Catherine Jan Jun (I/C No 750812-13-5326(f), 32 years o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top