COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DATO SERI MOHD NAJIB TUN HJ ABD RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI DALAM NEGERI & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the appeal (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the case (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. summary of applicant's arguments (Para 15 , 16) |
| 4. summary of the high court's decision (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. court's analysis on new evidence (Para 20 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 38) |
| 6. assessment of the credibility of evidence (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 7. principles governing grant of leave for judicial review (Para 59 , 61 , 62) |
| 8. conclusion on the appeal (Para 73 , 74) |
Introduction
[1] This present appeal before us is against the Kuala Lumpur High Court's decision dated 3 July 2024, which dismissed the Appellant's (the Applicant's) application for leave to commence Judicial Review proceedings.
[2] The said appeal was heard on 6 January 2025. At the end of the appeal, both my learned brother, Azhahari Kamal Ramli JCA and I decided in favour of the Appellant, whilst my learned sister, Azizah Nawawi JCA, dissented. We now give our reasons for deciding so.
Brief Facts
[3] The Applicant is the former Prime Minister of Malaysia.
[4] The Respondents are:
i. Minister of Home Affairs, the Ministe
Lau Foo Sun v. Government Of Malaysia
Maju Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Fortune Wealth (H-K) Ltd & Other Appeals
Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur v. Perbadanan Pengurusan Trellises & Ors And Other Appeals
Krishnasamy Kuppusamy & Anor v. Pengarah Hospital Sultanah Aminah & Ors And Other Appeals
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.