Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
STONE MASTER CORPORATION BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
DATO KOH MUI TEE & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's appeal against consent judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. details of loan agreements and corporate actions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. legal issues surrounding corporate actions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. consent judgment recorded and implications. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. arguments regarding fraud and illegality. (Para 35 , 46 , 48 , 49) |
| 6. law on setting aside consent judgments. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. admissibility of previous judgments as evidence. (Para 47 , 51 , 52 , 56 , 60) |
| 8. court's findings on the validity of consent judgment. (Para 73 , 76 , 78 , 80) |
| 9. conclusion on the appeal's merit. (Para 87) |
Introduction
[1] This is the Appellant's appeal against the decision of the learned High Court Judge ("HCJ") who had dismissed the Appellant's application to set aside a consent judgment dated 30 May 2017 ("the Consent Judgment") between the 4th Respondent as the plaintiff and the Appellant as the defendant in Kuala Lumpur High Court Civil Suit No: WA-22(NCC)-195-05-2017 ("Suit 195").
[2] In Suit 195, the 4th Respondent claimed a total sum of RM18 million due and owing by the Appe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
