Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
YAP SIEW DEEN – Appellant
Versus
M3 TECHNOLOGIES (ASIA) BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. details of the claimant's alleged misconduct (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. claimant's defense against the charges (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. court's role and burden of proof (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. court's findings on the claimant's misconduct (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 6. assessment of evidence and credibility of the claimant (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 7. conclusion on the dismissal and legal principles (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
Reference
[1] This is a reference made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the Act") to the Industrial Court dated 18 February 2022 with respect to a complaint of dismissal of YAP SIEW DEEN ("the claimant") by M3 TECHNOLOGIES (ASIA) BERHAD ("the company") on 6 September 2021.
Introduction
The Company
[2] The Company is a public listed company in Malaysia, and is now known as XOX Technology Berhad. M3 Online Sdn Bhd is a private limited company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company ("M3 Onl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
