SEBUMI MAGNETIK SDN BHD vs TWINSKY SEAFOOD RESTAURANT & ORS AND OTHER APPEAL

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 2000

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SEBUMI MAGNETIK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TWINSKY SEAFOOD RESTAURANT & ORS AND OTHER APPEAL – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Chung Jiun Dau ,Respondent Advocate: Ryan Soo Chin Fook,Cornelius Chua Chen Choon

Table of Content
1. appellate jurisdiction and leave to appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. factual background of tenancy and disputes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. importance of pleadings in civil litigation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19)
4. requirement to specifically plead claims. (Para 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali JCA:

Introduction

[1] There are two appeals heard together before us in respect of the assessment of damages decided by the Kota Kinabalu High Court on 20 November 2020. Civil Appeal No S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1973-12/2020 (CA 1973) was brought by the appellant/plaintiff and Civil Appeal No S- 02(IM)(NCvC)-1984-12/2020(CA 1984) was brought by the appellant/ defendants.

[2] On 26 May 2022, we dismissed both appeals with no order as to costs.

[3] Aggrieved by our decision in CA 1973, the appellant/plaintiff applied to the Federal Court for leave to appeal part of the decision in respect of the non-granting of double rent or double value claimed under para 28(4)(a) of the Civil Law Act 1956 ( CLA 1956) in the assessment of damages before the High Court.

[4] On 14 February 2023, The Federal Court unanimously ordered that the appellant/plaintiff be grant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 2000

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYASEBUMI MAGNETIK SDN BHD – AppellantVersusTWINSKY SEAFOOD RESTAURANT & ORS AND OTHER APPEAL – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SEBUMI MAGNETIK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TWINSKY SEAFOOD RESTAURANT & ORS AND OTHER APPEAL – Respondent