SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2171

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ABU BAKAR SALLEH & ORS – Appellant
Versus
LANGKASUKA RESORT SDN BHD (LANGKAWI BEACH RESORT & LANGKAWI AIRPORT SDN BH.... – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the appeal concerns unlawful termination linked to ownership changes. (Para 1 , 6 , 30)
2. overview of appeal process and court's decision. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. background facts detailing the applicants' employment status. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 19)
4. focus on legal arguments regarding the dismissal process. (Para 22 , 25 , 31 , 36)
5. judicial review process highlights improper decision-making in termination cases. (Para 24 , 34 , 43)
6. judgment emphasizes procedural fairness and employee rights within contractual frameworks. (Para 45)
7. analysis of procedural compliance and employment regulations. (Para 58 , 60 , 62)

[1] This is an appeal by the appellants (the applicants in the High Court) against of the decision of the High Court dated 26 May 2016 that upheld the Industrial Court's Award No: 50 of 2015.

[2] We heard this appeal on 1 December 2016. After hearing the respective parties, we adjourned the matter for our consideration and decision. Before we adjourned the same, we ordered the parties to further submit on the issue of whether a company can transfer its employees to an associate company, which submission was to be delivered to our respective secretaries w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top