MUHAMMAD NAZIFI KUSNUN vs PENGURUSAN AIR SELANGOR SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:Imran Ismail,Anis Farhana Mohd Soji ,Respondent Advocate: Jane Tan Yang Qian,Cik Atiqah Munirah Abd Rahim

Table of Content
1. reference under industrial relations act (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. deceased claimant's employment history and performance issues (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. company's actions regarding pip and dismissal (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. arguments against dismissal (Para 25)
5. function of the industrial court (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
6. criteria for proving poor performance (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
7. evidence of performance evaluation (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
8. review sessions and performance scores (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
9. consequences of poor performance (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
10. senior management expectations (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
11. test for dismissal due to poor performance (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
12. hearsay evidence considerations (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
13. company's justification for dismissal (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69)
14. legal standards for dismissal (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73)
15. conclusion on dismissal (Para 74)

Paramalingam J Doraisamy:

Reference

[1] This is a reference made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177), arising out of the dismissal of