COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MAJLIS AMANAH RAKYAT & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
MAT NAWI AWANG & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the procedural history and damages awarded. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. overview of claims regarding financial losses. (Para 2 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. assessment of actual versus speculative losses. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 4. details on reputational harm and damages. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. application of legal standards regarding various damages. (Para 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
[1] This is an appeal by the appellants vide encl 105 against the decision of the High Court at Kota Bharu made on 23 November 2015 wherein the learned Judicial Commissioner (JC) affirmed the award given by the Deputy Registrar in an assessment of damages proceedings. The respondent also filed a cross appeal vide encl 107 because the damages awarded to him were said to be inadequate.
[2] The judgment against the appellants was a Judgment in Default of Defence recorded before Justice Mohd Azman bin Husin on 1 December 2008.
[3] The facts giving rise to a claim for damages are narrated by the learned JC in his judgment in Bahasa Malaysia at p 9 of Rekod Rayuan Tambahan as follows:
"[6] Tuntutan plaintif di dalam kes ini adalah berasaskan kausa tindakan konspirasi atau komp
Kamarulzaman Omar & Ors v. Yakub Husin & Ors
Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd Kuala Trengganu v. Mae Perkayuan Sdn Bhd & Anor
Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd v. Sophisticated Pipe Industry Production Sdn Bhd
Sime UEP Properties Bhd v. Woon Nyoke Lin
YB Dato' Paduka Husam Musa v. YB Dato' Nozula Mat Diah & Ors (No 2)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.