SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 1905

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
BAYANGAN SEPADU SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
JABATAN PENGAIRAN DAN SALIRAN NEGERI SELANGOR & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Leong Wai Hong,Richard Kok,Karen Tan,Tan Ko Xin ,Respondent Advocate: Nur Irmawatie Daud,Muhammad Haziq Hashim

Judgement Key Points

The provided legal document primarily discusses issues related to land registration, the indefeasibility of titles under the Torrens System, the validity of land surrender procedures, and the rights of registered versus unregistered interests. It addresses questions of ownership, statutory compliance, and the legal effects of land transactions, including auctions and surrender processes.

There is no explicit mention or discussion of summary judgment procedures or applications for summary judgment. The focus is on the substantive legal principles governing land ownership, registration, and trespass, rather than procedural motions such as summary judgment.

Therefore, based on the provided document, this case is not related to summary judgment.


JUDGMENT

Mohd Zawawi Salleh FCJ:

Introduction

[1] This appeal requires us to consider important questions that go to the heart of the land registration under the Torrens System. One of the central issues is whether a successful bidder at the auction sale under the National Land Code 1965 ("the NLC") must recognise the interest of a person or a body not registered against the title to the land now duly registered in the successful bidder's name. Put another way, the question is whether a promise by the Previous Owner to surrender the land to the State of Authority Selangor is binding on the appellant, a successful bidder at the auction under the NLC, who has not at any time consented to the fenced-off lake and its related structures for flood mitigation to be on the land now duly registered in his name.

[2] On 16 February 2021, this court granted leave to the appellant to appeal against the majority decision of the court of Appeal on the following two questions of law-

(i) "Assuming that Subject Land Lot 18903 was the agreed lot to be surrendered to Majlis Perbandaran Shah Alam (which is denied) whether the right of the appellant as the registered owner under ss 89 (conclusiveness of r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top