SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 736

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LEE CHAI SENG – Appellant
Versus
MAGNUM CONSORTIUM SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the appeal originates from a dispute regarding a caveat on registered land. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 12)
2. the consent order was set aside as it violated natural justice rights. (Para 15 , 23 , 28)
Aziah Ali JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court in Penang dated 29 September 2011 which had allowed the application filed by the respondent, Magnum Consortium Sdn Bhd for leave to intervene in Originating Motion No: 25-16-2011 ("OM 25-16-2011") and to set aside a consent order dated 8 March 2011 ("the consent order") entered into between the appellant, Lee Chai Seng and the Registrar of Titles, Penang ("the Registrar").

[2] In OM 25-16-2011, the appellant is the applicant and the Registrar is the respondent. It is an appeal by the appellant under s 418 of the National Land Code (" NLC ") against the decision of the Registrar in refusing his application to enter a Registrar's caveat on five parcels of land known as Lot Nos 35, 44, 45, 48 and 2816, Grant Nos 5655, 5657, 5658, 5659 and 71105 situated at Section 1, Butterworth, Daerah Seberang Perai Utara, Penang ("the lands").

[3] On 8 March 2011 the appellant and the Registrar entered

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top