SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 2863

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KIM GUAN CHOONG SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENGARAH PEJABAT TANAH DAN GALIAN PULAU PINANG & ORS AND OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
[Civil Appeal Nos: P-01(NCVC)(W)-39-01-2020 P-01(NCVC)(W)-134-01-2020 & P-01(NCVC)(W)-135-01-2020]



Petitioner Advocates:Sharon Shakila Gabriel,Venkateswari P Alagendra ,Respondent Advocate: Siti Hafiza Jaafar

The court upheld the validity of contracts executed by directors despite bankruptcy, emphasizing that claims of fraud must be substantiated with clear evidence, and actions were barred by limitation and laches.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act 1965 - Section 127 - Limitation Act 1953 - Sections 9 and 29 - Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 - Appeal against High Court's dismissal of claims for fraudulent land transfer - Appellant alleged fraud and conspiracy regarding land ownership, but failed to prove essential elements of fraud - Court held that actions were barred by limitation and laches - Validity of contracts executed by bankrupt directors upheld under statutory provisions - Indefeasible title granted to bona fide purchasers. (Paras 50, 51, 55, 81, 108)

(B) Fraud - Definition and burden of proof - Elements of fraud must be established by clear and convincing evidence - Mere allegations without substantial proof insufficient to support claims of conspiracy. (Paras 55, 60, 79)

(C) Laches - Doctrine of laches applied where there is undue delay in asserting claims, leading to prejudice against defendants - Appellant's claims barred due to inaction over 18 years. (Paras 97, 100)

(D)

Result: Appeals dismissed with costs.

Table of Content
1. introduction of related appeals and factual context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. background facts regarding the appellant and land ownership. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. details of the appellant's claims and allegations of fraud. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. respondents' case and their arguments against appellant's claims. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
5. further details on transactions and agreements related to the land. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
6. court proceedings and claims filed by respondents. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
7. high court's findings and legal reasoning. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
8. legal principles regarding fraud and burden of proof. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
9. analysis of elements of fraud and conspiracy. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
10. discussion on authority and actions of directors. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
11. court's evaluation of evidence and findings. (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80)
12. limitation period and laches as defenses. (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88)
13. public authorities protection act and its implications. (Para 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94)
14. final conclusions and dismissal of appeals. (Para 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104)
Yaacob Md Sam JCA:

Introduction

[1] There are three (3) related appeals before us which are as follows:

i. Civil Appeal No P-01(NCVC)(W)-39-01/2020 ("Appeal 39");

ii. Civil Appeal No P-01(NCVC(W))-134-01/2020 ("Appeal 134"); and

iii. Civil Appeal No P-01(NCVC)(W)-135-1/2020 ("Appeal 135").

Appeal 39 is the Appellant Kim Guan Choong Sdn Bhd's appeal against the decision of the High Court of Malaya, Penang in dismissing the Appellant's claim against the 1st Respondent, 2nd Respondent; 3rd Respondent, 4th Respondent, 5th Respondent, 6th Respondent, 7th Respondent, 9th Respondent, 8th Respondent, 10th Respondent, 11th Respondent, 12th Respondent, 13 th Respondent and 14th Respondent and awarding costs of RM60,000.00 each to be paid by the Appellant to the respective R1, R2, R3, R5, R6, R8, R13 and R14 herein.

Appeal 134 is the Appellant Kim Guan Choong Sdn Bhd's appeal against the decision of the High Court of Malaya, Penang in allowing Greentech Industries Sdn Bhd (10th Respondent)'s claim against the Appellant with costs.

Appeal 135 is the Appellant Kim Guan Choong Sdn Bhd's appeal against the decision of the High Court of Malaya, Penang in allowing Greentech Industries Sdn Bhd (10th Respondent)'s claim against the Appellant with a total costs of RM80,000.00.

Background Facts

[2] The Appellant (plaintiff) is a family-owned company incorporated by one, Ng Boon Kow, and after his demise on 31 May 1979, the following persons were the directors of the Appellant and remained as such until 30 May 1992:

(a) Madam Tan Soo Lang @ Tan Choon Lian;

(b) Ng Seah Hung ('R2');

(c) Ng Seah Hock ('R3');

(d) Ng Seah Kang;

(e) Ng Seah Kheng;

(f) Ng Seah Theam;

(g) Ng Seah Hai (PW1); and

(h) Oi Siah Cheng

[3] Meanwhile, the Respondents in this case, can be identified as follows:

[4] The subject matter in dispute, in this case, refers to the 2/3 portion of the land that belongs to the plaintiff which was transferred to R4 and subsequently transferred to R10. The title of the land has been changed several times as follows:

(a) The land was held under Temporary Title No H.S (D) 120, Mukim 14, Daerah Seberang Perai, Pulau Pinang. was registered on 30 June 1978 under the plaintiff's name ('HSD 120');

(b) HSD 120 subsequently became known as HS(D) 296 Mukim 14 Daerah Seberang Perai, Negeri Pulau Pinang, and the date of the issuance of this title is 11 June 1990 ('HSD 296');

(c) Thereafter, HSD 296 became known as Title No 1487 (Plot 7) s 3, Bandar Butterworth, Seberang Perai, Pulau Pinang, Mak Mandin Industrial Estate Mukim 14 Daerah Seberang Perai ('Lot 1487');

(d) Later, Lot 1487 was subdivided/partitioned and further issued unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top