SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1111

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
SOON LEE HUAT PALM OIL MILL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
STABLE-WIN SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of lease agreement and mutual mistakes. (Para 1 , 5)
2. introduction to the case and appellate decision (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. analysis of mutual mistake regarding the milling licence. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
4. legal requirements for issuing a milling licence. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. differentiating between mistake of fact and mistake of law. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner of the High Court of Malaya at Muar, Johor, delivered on 7 February 2011, granting the respondent/plaintiff's application for a declaration that a lease agreement dated 17 April 2009 entered into between the respondent/plaintiff and the appellant/defendant is null and void by reason of a mutual mistake of fact; and for an order that the appellant/defendant surrenders the palm oil mill to the respondent/plaintiff within seven days from the date of the order.

[2] We have unanimously allowed the appeal with costs fixed at RM15,000.00.

[3] We now give our reasons.

[4] For ease of reference, we will be referring to the parties as they were at trial below, that is to say, as plaintiff and defendant, as the case may be.

The Facts

[5] The f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top