PP vs GAN BOON AUN & ANOR - 2012 MarsdenLR 1629

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2012 MarsdenLR 1629

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PP – Appellant
Versus
GAN BOON AUN & ANOR – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Shanti Geoffrey,Nor Rifhan ,Respondent Advocate: Tan Hock Chuan,Cheah Sin Chin,Cains Tan

Table of Content
1. constitutional question of s 122(1) validity. (Para 1 , 2)
2. charges outline under the securities industry act. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's referral on constitutional questions. (Para 7)
4. defence objections to the constitutionality of the charging provision. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. interpretation priorities for the federal constitution. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. arguments on constitutionality of s 122(1) of the act. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 26)
7. arguments for constitutional validity of s 122(1). (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
8. court's perspective on submitting law arguments. (Para 57 , 58)
9. court's decision on unconstitutionality./ (Para 59 , 154)
10. court reviewed arguments and submissions. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)
11. conclusion and implications of the judgement. (Para 240 , 241 , 242 , 243)
12. final ruling on unconstitutionality of the clause. (Para 244 , 245)

[1] This is a reference by a subordinate court to the High court pursuant to s 30 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (the "CJA") for the determination of the following constitutional question:

[2] Whether s 122(1) of the Securities Industry Act 1983 (Act 280) violates arts 5(1) and 8(1)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2012 MarsdenLR 1629

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURPP – AppellantVersusGAN BOON AUN & ANOR – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PP – Appellant
Versus
GAN BOON AUN & ANOR – Respondent