SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 72

ZAWAWI SALLEH
LIM HUNG WANG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent



The court ruled it lacks the authority to review its own prima facie finding due to absence of legislative provisions allowing such review.

Headnote:(A) Courts of Judicature Act 1964 - Section 25(1); Criminal Procedure Code (Revised 1999) - Section 180; Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Review of prima facie finding - The applicants sought to review the court's determination that a prima facie case had been established against them for trafficking methamphetamine. The court found that the prosecution had indeed proven a prima facie case, and there were no grounds to revisit this ruling. The applicants' arguments regarding evidential chain breaks were insufficient to establish a need for review. (Paras 1, 11, 35)

LIM HUNG WANG & ORS vs PP - 2011 MarsdenLR 72
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top