SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 340

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
YEE HOCK LAI & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
UNITY PERFORMANCE SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court's analysis on contractual termination issues. (Para 2 , 11 , 12)
2. details of property sale and agreement execution. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments concerning the breach of agreement and mala fides. (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
4. merits of appeal concerning hda terms. (Para 8)

[1] The appellants/plaintiffs' appeal is in respect of the sale and purchase of a property based on the format of sch G of Housing Development (Control & Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA). The appeal came up for hearing on 17 April 2013 and we allowed the appeal relating to the relevant prayers coupled with consequential directions. My learned brother BaliaYusof Haji Wahi JCA and my learned sister Lim Yee Lan JCA have read the judgment and approved the same.

[2] At the outset we must say that an appellate court will not ordinarily disturb the finding of facts of the trial court. (See Kyros International Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri , 2013 MarsdenLR 990 ). However, if the law is not applied correctly on the facts of the case, appellate intervention is necessary and incumbent to sustain the integrity of the decision making process.

Brief Facts

[3] The appellants and respondents are respecti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top